Legal Opinion
Hargrove v. Henderson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 30, 1930No. Docket No. 4134PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MR. JUSTICE LUTTRELL, pro tem., Delivered the Opinion of the Court.
Plaintiffs and appellants, who are husband and wife, brought this action against defendants and respondents to recover damages for fraudulent representations made as to the quantity and boundary lines of a certain tract of land sold by them to plaintiffs in the county of Orange, state of California.
Plaintiff A. E. Hargrove engaged in the real estate business in said county in the year 1919. On March 1, 1920, he entered into a copartnership with defendants Harry O. Henderson and J. Lloyd Moore and a man by the name of Wagner.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- People v. SakariasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Clark v. . BairdNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Whitney v. . AllaireNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Coakley v. AjuriaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nathanson v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Glickman v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- MacCo Construction Co. v. FickertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hall v. Southern Cal. Edison Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Richard v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.