General Electric Capital Corp. v. Osterkamp
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACAGNINA, Judge.
In this appeal from orders setting aside default entered against Elizabeth Osterkamp and granting summary judgment in her favor, we must decide whether her counsel’s misunderstanding of the effect of the 10-day grace period provided in Ariz. R.Civ.P. 55(a), 16 A.R.S., which resulted in his failure to file an answer within that period, is a sufficient reason for setting aside the default and the judgment under Ariz.R.Civ.P. 60(c)(1), 16 A.R.S. We hold that it is not and reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 29, 1988, General Electric Capital Corporation filed…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- General Electric Capital Corp. v. OsterkampCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Great Western Bank v. LJC Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Hilgeman v. American Mortgage Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Ruiz v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.