Legal Opinion

Julson v. City of Sioux Falls

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1925No. File No. 5836PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Action by plaintiff as a resident, elector, and taxpayer of the city of Sioux Falls, against the city, and the officers and governing body thereof, to enjoin the proposed issuance and sale of certain municipal bonds. Defendants demurred that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and, from an order sustaining said demurrer, plaintiff appeals.

The complaint alleges that, pursuant to a resolution of the then board of commissioners of respondent city, a special election was held in said city on November 5, 1918, at which the question of a bond issue was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Leavenworth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Beers v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Logan v. City of BismarckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Gilley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lang v. City of CavalierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Drummond v. City of ColumbusNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938
  5. Grabe v. Lamro Independent Consolidated School District, No. 20South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API