Grabe v. Lamro Independent Consolidated School District, No. 20
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORIARTY, C.
This action was brought by the appellants to recover from the respondent school district a balance alleged to be due to them for services as architects. The evidence was taken before a jury, but, after both parties had) rested, each moved the court for the direction oí a verdict, and the jury was excused. The court made findings and conclusions favorable to respondent’s contentions and entered judgment for respondent. From said judgment and an order denying a new trial, this appeal is taken.
The record shows that in the yeár 19x9 the board of the respondent district was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Leavenworth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- State ex rel. Williams v. Sawyer CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Hooper v. EmerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1837
- Neacy v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Aldrich v. CollinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of County Com'rs of Bernalillo County v. McCullohNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
- Egan Consolidated School District Number 1 v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Board of Com'rs of Guadalupe County v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
- Oklahoma County, Excise Board v. KurnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Hendricks v. School Dist. No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.