Legal Opinion

City of Salem v. Oregon-Washington Water Service Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

The purposes of this proceeding are to determine whether a special election held in the city of Salem December 15, 1931, was a legal election, and, if so, whether a measure approved on that day by the registered voters of that city, and which now appears as section 90 of the Salem Municipal Charter, conflicts with any legislative enactment of superior authority, or any constitutional provision. For purposes of brevity we shall hereafter refer to the enactment of December 15, 1931, as section 90. Succinctly stated, those portions of it which we deem material to this controversy authorize the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Washington-Detroit Theatre Co. v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. DeFazio v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Oregon Creamery Manufacturers Ass'n v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Stanley v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Wright v. Hazen Investments, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API