Keokuk Waterworks Co. v. Keokuk
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtHamiltoN, J.
This action involves the legality of the proceedings whereby the city of Keokuk, Iowa, undertook to exercise the power which the legislature has vested in “cities and towns * * * to purchase, establish, erect, maintain, and operate * * * waterworks,” etc., section 6127, Code 1935. The fact that power exists in the city to do what it undertook to do is not questioned. The bone of contention is the manner of doing it.
For approximately fifty years, the Keokuk Waterworks Company, one of the plaintiffs and appellants, has been furnishing the city of Keokuk and its inhabitants with water. Since…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. City of Arkansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
- City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Epping v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Merrill v. MonticelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Interstate Power Co. v. Town of McGregorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. BurchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- De Sauvage v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Selken v. Northland Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- City of Des Moines v. ReiterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.