Legal Opinion

Hedin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 17, 1984No. C8-83-1363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Plaintiffs Sandra and Lee Hedin are Indiana residents injured in a Minnesota accident as passengers in a automobile garaged in Minnesota, owned by a Minnesota resident and operated by Lee Hedin. They claim full benefits of Minnesota uninsured motorist coverage and asked the trial court to so declare their entitlement to same. Their Indiana carrier, respondent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, moved for summary judgment denying the coverage sought by the Hedins. They succeeded and the Hedins appeal. We affirm.

FACTS

On February 10, 1981, plaintiffs Lee…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Petty v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Toni Brill v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Aguilar v. Texas Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Crews v. Criterion Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Great West Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Warthan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API