Legal Opinion

Nowell v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1973No. 42501PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.

Respondent, Richard Lee Nowell, was, upon reasonable grounds, arrested and charged with the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The arresting officer requested that he submit to a chemical sobriety test after properly advising him of his rights and of the consequences of a refusal pursuant to RCW 46.20.308, the implied consent law. Respondent refused to take the test. Thereafter, he entered a plea of guilty to the charge and was sentenced. His driver’s, license was not, however, suspended or revoked by the court.

The Department of Motor Vehicles initiated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Prucha v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  4. August v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Serenko v. BrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Spokane v. KrugerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. BostromWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Medcalf v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Department of Licensing v. LaxWashington Supreme Court · 1995

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API