Department of Licensing v. Lax
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
This case requires us to decide whether a person suspected of driving while intoxicated who initially refuses a breath or blood test can later withdraw or negate the refusal, thereby avoiding administrative revocation of the driving privilege. Ralph Lax’s driver’s license was revoked by the Department of Licensing (Department) for refusing to submit to a blood test following his arrest for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DWI), despite the fact that Lax consented to a blood test approximately 12 minutes after his initial refusal. He appealed and the Department’s action was…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Cherry v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lund v. HjelleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Standish v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
- Krueger v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. CornejoWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Heinmiller v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re BootWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.