Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Department of Licensing

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1989No. 55740-3, 55741-1PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndersen, J.

Facts of Cases

In these consolidated cases, the State of Washington Department of Licensing revoked the driver's licenses of Michael Gonzales and Lisa Jo Tomkins for refusing to submit to a Breathalyzer test after being arrested for driving while intoxicated. Mr. Gonzales and Ms. Tomkins challenge their respective license revocations, claiming that they were not properly advised of their implied consent rights concerning the taking of this test. We affirm.

The case of State v. Bartels, 112 Wn.2d 882, 774 P.2d 1183 (1989), referred to herein, is a companion to the two cases here before us in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. Whitman County District CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. BartelsWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Connolly v. Department of Motor VehiclesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. ZwickerWashington Supreme Court · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Department of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thompson v. State Dept. of LicensingWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WilsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. SchulzeWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. City of Spokane v. KrugerWashington Supreme Court · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API