State v. Moore
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
The constitutionality of the Washington “Tm-*52plied Consent Law” is here before this court for the first time. The law — adopted by the electorate as Initiative Measure No. 242 on November 5, 1968 — 1 requires motorists suspected of driving while intoxicated to submit to a chemical test of blood alcohol content or face revocation of their license to drive.
The appellant stands convicted in the King County Superior Court of driving while intoxicated. We have accepted the direct appeal here because of the fundamental issues requiring ultimate determination by this court. In affirming appellant’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. FrancoWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. BraymanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.