Serenko v. Bright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
Elizabeth Ann Serenko appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying her application for a writ of mandamus 1 and prohibition against the taking of her California driver’s license by respondent.
Appellant, who disputes herein the effect and application of the “implied consent law” (Veh. Code, § 13353), was the holder of a California driver’s license in September 1966 when the subject statute was enacted. Shortly thereafter, on November 15, 1966, at approximately 3:45 a.m., Officer Charles Powers of the Santa Monica Police Department' was driving his patrol ear southbound on Ocean Avenue…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hohreiter v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Watson v. Division of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Bertch v. Social Welfare DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Corcoran v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
- Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Walker v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.