Legal Opinion

Serenko v. Bright

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1968No. Civ. 31848PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.

Elizabeth Ann Serenko appeals from a judgment of the superior court denying her application for a writ of mandamus 1 and prohibition against the taking of her California driver’s license by respondent.

Appellant, who disputes herein the effect and application of the “implied consent law” (Veh. Code, § 13353), was the holder of a California driver’s license in September 1966 when the subject statute was enacted. Shortly thereafter, on November 15, 1966, at approximately 3:45 a.m., Officer Charles Powers of the Santa Monica Police Department' was driving his patrol ear southbound on Ocean Avenue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hohreiter v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Watson v. Division of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Bertch v. Social Welfare DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Corcoran v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Hernandez v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Andrews v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Joyner v. GarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Walker v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API