Legal Opinion

Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Co. v. Farnham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 20, 1893PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the Probate Court of Canadian County,

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BURFORD, J.:

— The appellee, the Walter A. Wood Mowing and Reaping Company, brought their suit in the probate court of Canadian county to recover judgment against appellant, Farnham, on several promissory notes executed by divers persons to the appellee, and bearing the following endorsement :

“For value received I hereby guarantee the payment of the within note, demand for payment, protest and notice of protest waived.

A. A. Farnham.”

The complaint contained a separate paragraph for each of the several notes.

Trial was had by jury and verdict returned in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. LaRose v. Logansport National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wright v. GriffithIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Ward v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Burnham v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Frash v. PolkIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Glaser v. GlaserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  2. Borg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  3. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  4. Federal Corp. v. Independent School District No. 13Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Stanard v. Sampson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API