Legal Opinion

Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1932No. Nos. 122, 485, 486PublishedCited by 527 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The refining company by this suit seeks to enjoin the commission, attorney general and other state officers from enforcing certain provisions of c. 25 of the laws of Oklahoma enacted February 11, 1915, * §and certain orders of the commission on the ground that they are repugnant to the due process and equal -protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and the commerce clause. The district court consisting of three judges, 28 U. S. C., § 380, denied plaintiff’s application for a temporary injunction, and No. 122 is plaintiff’s appeal from such refusal. As final judgment has been entered,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by527 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

522 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API