Legal Opinion
Hopkins v. Hopkins
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 12, 1934PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
The questions at issue relate to the administration and distribution of the estate of George L. Hop*544kins, deceased intestate, late of Somerset. The facts are agreed. So far as material they are these: The intestate was married in New York in 1873. Two children, the issue of that marriage, were born in that State, at present reside there and are respondents in the first petition and the petitioners in the second. Without being divorced, the intestate in 1888 left his wife and children, came to this Commonwealth where shortly afterwards he began living with Mary R Sullivan and continued to live…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WeloskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Harvey-Watts Co. v. Worcester Umbrella Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
- Adams v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
- Tuells v. FlintMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Main v. County of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Berry v. KyesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Boston Retirement BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Gorey v. GuarenteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.