Legal Opinion

Bekins v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 2, 1956No. 37353PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

At an election held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, in 1952, said City’s voters gave their approval to its issuance of municipal bonds in the amount of $450,000 to be known as Library Improvement Bonds, which, according to the ballot title voted on, was: “ * * * to provide funds for the purpose of purchasing, repairing, improving and equipping public libraries * * * (etc.).”

It is conceded that said bonds were voted and subsequently issued under the claimed authority of the 'Oklahoma Constitution’s Art. X, § 27, which provides such method by which incorporated cities or towns may exceed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Edwards v. MillarSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. City of Ardmore v. State Ex Rel. BestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Coleman v. FrameSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. State Ex Rel. Manhattan Const. Co. v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Barnes v. HillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Shawnee v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Polk v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  3. Settle v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
  4. Brown v. Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Board of Cty. Com'rs of Co. of Tulsa v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API