Legal Opinion

Beltran v. Piersody

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 2000No. 1606PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Philip Piersody (“Piersody”) appeals from the trial court’s order granting intervenor status, in an ongoing custody action, to Raymond Beltran (“Beltran”). We hold that the order granting intervenor status to Beltran is interlocutory and unreviewable at this time, as the trial court has not yet rendered a final determination on the custody issues. Accordingly, we quash.

¶2 The relevant facts and procedural history of this case are as follows. Pierso-dy and Maryke Faessen Beltran (“Mother”) have been engaged in a ten-year custody battle over J.P., who was born out of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. G.B. v. M.M.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. WellsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Step Plan Services, Inc. v. KoreskoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Jacksonian v. Temple University Health System FoundationSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. In re N.B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation v. HodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. American Independent Insurance v. E.S. Ex Rel. CrespoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API