Legal Opinion

G.B. v. M.M.B.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1996PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

We granted en banc review in this case in order to clarify when orders relating to child custody will be deemed final and therefore ripe for appeal. We hold that a custody order will be considered final and appealable only after the trial court has completed its hearings on the merits and the resultant order resolves the pending custody claims between the parties.

In the instant case we conclude that the order on appeal is interlocutory. The order allowed appellee, the children’s father, periods of partial custody of his two sons pending completion of hearings on the issues of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Karis v. KarisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth ex rel. Beemer v. BeemerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. K.C. and V.C. v. L.A. Appeal of: D.M and L.N.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Beltran v. PiersodySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In re D.A.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. T.B. v. L.R.M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. In Re the Marriage of DenlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API