Legal Opinion
Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 29, 1998PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Appellants, Paulette B. Pace and Hugh D. Pace, have filed an appeal from the April 7, 1998 Order, entered in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, denying appellants’ motion for leave to file an amended complaint. Appellees have filed a motion to quash this appeal. Thus, we must determine whether this Order is properly on appeal to this Court. Following a careful review of the applicable law and the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, we conclude that the Order at issue is interlocutory and does not meet the requirements of an appealable Order. Accordingly, we quash.
The…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- MacGregor v. Mediq Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Borough of Mifflinburg v. HeimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Berkeyheiser v. A-Plus Investigations, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- In re Estate of CellaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Takosky v. HenningSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.