Legal Opinion

Ben v. Schwartz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1999PublishedCited by 173 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

The issue presented in these appeals is whether the order of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, compelling the Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs to produce its investigative file pertaining to complaints filed against a dentist, is appealable under the exception to the final order rule for collateral orders. We find that the order was appealable as a collateral order and remand for further proceedings.

On October 11, 1994, Ewa Marta Ben and Arthur T. Ben filed‘a writ of summons against Burton Schwartz, D.D.S. and Dr. Vincent DePancis, t/a Suburban…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. In Re Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by173 opinions

  1. Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Gillard v. AIG InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Pridgen v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API