Legal Opinion

Jacksonian v. Temple University Health System Foundation

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2004PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Temple University Health System, its related entities, and three physician co-defendants (collectively, TUHS) appeal the trial court’s discovery order directing the Temple University Hospital (the hospital) to answer Shaneen Jacksonian’s (Patient) interrogatories in her medical malpractice lawsuit against TUHS and the hospital. TUHS claims the information sought by the interrogatories is privileged and is protected from discovery by the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11101, et seq., and the Peer Review Protection Act, 63 P.S. § 425.1, et seq. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Melvin v. DoeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Geniviva v. FriskSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Jones v. FaustSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Babb v. Centre Community HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. In Re: Estate of Moskowitz, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Gunn v. Automobile Insurance Co. of HartfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  4. Digital Communication v. Allen InvestmentsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Pennsy Supply, Inc. v. MummaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API