Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
T1 Holliday Water Company appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Salt Lake County, which requires Holliday Water to fluoridate its water supply in compliance with Salt Lake Valley Health Department's Regulation 33 (as amended).
1 2 While these proceedings were pending, the Utah State Legislature passed Senate Bill 29, amending Utah Code section 19-4-111 to exempt "corporate public water systems" from having to comply with Regulation 33. Holliday Water, contending it is a corporate public water system as defined by the new statute, filed…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Brookside Mobile Home Park, Ltd. v. PeeblesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Peterson v. the Sunrider Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Gressman v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Golden Meadows Properties, LC v. StrandCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- State v. AngilauUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. LeggUtah Supreme Court · 2018
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.