Legal Opinion

Park v. ALTA DITCH & CANAL COMPANY

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1969No. 11345PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Plaintiff, Dean E. Park, brought this action to assert and have determined his rights to his claimed aliquot share, 2/288ths, represented by two shares of stock of water of the defendant Alta Ditch & Canal Company. He further insists upon the right to take through a connection with the pipeline of Orem City and thus at a higher point of diversion than the defendants contend he is entitled to. Orem City and its Metropolitan Water District were made defendants. Upon a trial, the District Court found that the plaintiff was the owner of two shares of stock and entitled to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Genola Town v. Santaquin CityUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Smithfield West Bench Irr. Co. v. Union Central Life Ins.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
  3. George v. RobisonUtah Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Tracy Loan & Trust Co. v. Merchants' BankUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Trustees, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Groen v. Tri-O-Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Reedeker v. SalisburyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
  3. Okelberry v. WEST DANIELS LAND ASSOCIATIONCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  4. East Jordan Irrigation Co. v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Erickson v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API