Legal Opinion
State v. Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 2002No. 20000413PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUSSON, Justice:
{1 The Utah Department of Wildlife Resources ("DWR"), a shareholder in the Huntington-Cleveland Irrigation Company ("HCIC"), filed a complaint to challenge unequal share assessments levied by HCIC and the reduction of DWR's voting rights. The trial court dismissed the complaint, finding that the statute of limitations precluded the claims asserted therein. We reverse and remand.
BACKGROUND
12 When determining whether a trial court properly dismissed an action, we accept the factual allegations in the complaint as true and consider them, and all reasonable inferences to be drawn…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Snyder v. Town Insulation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. SchofieldUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GomezUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilson Supply, Inc. v. Fradan Manufacturing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Lovendahl v. Jordan School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- Brunell v. Wildwood Crest Police DepartmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.