Legal Opinion

Bonham v. Morgan

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1989No. 880143PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment which denied them standing to pursue count one of their complaint against the state engineer. The summary judgment was certified final under rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure to vest this Court with jurisdiction to hear the appeal. See Utah Code Ann. § 78-2-2(3)(e)(v) (Supp.1988).

Plaintiff Stanley B. Bonham, who is not a water user, protested against a permanent change application filed under Utah Code Ann. § 73-3-3 (1980) 1 in the office of the defendant state engineer (state engineer) in June of 1984 by defendants Salt Lake County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. P.I.E. Employees Federal Credit Union v. BassUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Johnson v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Tanner v. Humphreys, State EngineerUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Moyle v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. State v. LarsenUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Clover v. Snowbird Ski ResortUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Hansen v. Mountain Fuel Supply Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Schurtz v. BMW of North America, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API