Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 12, 1986No. 85-6580-C; CA A36627PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant was charged by a complaint in District Court with the misdemeanor of promoting gambling in the second degree. ORS 167.122. The trial court sustained her demurrer to the complaint, and the state appeals. It did so on the grounds that the complaint (1) fails to state sufficient facts to constitute an offense and (2) is not definite and certain. ORS 135.630(4) and (6). We agree and affirm.

The state argues that an accusatory instrument 2 is sufficient if it describes the offense in the words of the statute and contains all of the elements of the crime. Although there has been a trend in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. NussbaumOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. KincaidCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. FairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. State v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. AntoineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API