Legal Opinion

State v. Morgan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 1997No. 96CR1097FA, 96CR1097FB, 96CR1097FC; CA A95034PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendants were charged by indictment with one count each of delivery, possession and manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. They demurred on the ground that the indictment was not sufficiently definite and certain as required under ORS 132.550(7). The trial court sustained the demurrer, and the state appeals. ORS 138.060(1). We reverse.

Following the execution of a search warrant at a residence, the state submitted evidence to a grand jury, which returned the indictment against defendants on April 30, 1996. The indictment alleged in the language of the statute in three separate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WimberOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  4. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gonzalo Dominguez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Antoine v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. AndreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. DalineCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API