Legal Opinion

People v. Lamanuzzi

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1926No. Docket No. 1273PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An information was filed against respondent in the superior court in and for the county of Fresno, the pleading consisting of three counts identical in form with the exception of the date on which the act charged was alleged to have been committed and the names of- certain minors connected therewith. The minors mentioned were two boys both aged seventeen years and a girl of the age of fifteen years. The charge in each count, as shown by the language of the first, which we quote, was as follows: “Victor Lamanuzzi is accused ... of the crime of misdemeanor, to wit, violation of section 21 of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RoblesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  4. People v. DunlapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. People v. BergotiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Mandel v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  4. People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. People v. PerfettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API