Legal Opinion

People v. Baker

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 2, 1918No. Crim. No. 447PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

By information filed by the district attorney of Humboldt County it was charged as follows: ‘ ‘ That the said defendant Peter Baker, did then and there, to wit: in said certain saloon, barroom and place in said city of Eureka, county of Humboldt, state of California, on said 23rd day of December, 1917, willfully, knowingly and unlaw fully sell, furnish and give to Prank Mahan, who was then and there a minor under the age of twenty-one years, to wit: of the age of eighteen years, intoxicating liquor, to wit: beer. That said act by said defendant Peter Baber did then and there manifestly cause,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  2. People v. BergotiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. People v. OliverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Provigo Corp. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. BRACCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. People v. LowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. People v. PerfettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API