People v. Robles
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William T. Wallace-Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
Defendant has been convicted of the crime of perjury, and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. He has attacked the sufficiency of the indictment both by demurrer and motion in arrest of judgment, and to that attack we will address our attention.
As appears by the indictment, one Abbott was convicted of grand larceny. She. moved for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. At the hearing of the motion her counsel used the affidavit of this defendant, which was sworn to by him before a party duly authorized to administer oaths. By this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. NaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. AgnewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- People v. JohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- State v. BettsArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.