Legal Opinion

People v. Bergotini

California Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1916No. Crim. No. 1955. In BankPublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The offense sought to be charged in the information was contributing to the dependency of certain minors.

The charging part of the information was as follows:

"The said Frank Bergotini on or about the 4th day of July, A. D. One Thousand Nine Hundred and fourteen and for eight months next prior thereto, at and in the County of Sonoma, State of California, did willfully and unlawfully contribute to the dependency of dependent children as follows: That at all times herein mentioned and now, Doris…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DunnOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. MannOregon Supreme Court · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MalleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. People v. De LeonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  3. People v. LamanuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. People v. McDougalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API