Legal Opinion

People v. Dunlap

California Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1896No. Crim. No. 144PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The defendant was indicted for perjury in making a false statement of her property to the county assessor of the county of San Luis Obispo. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained, and the people have appealed from the judgment entered thereon.

Without considering all the objections made to the sufficiency of the indictment, the failure to state therein that the defendant was sworn, or took an oath before any person authorized to administer the same, was a sufficient ground for sustaining the demurrer. The indictment states that the defendant appeared before Charles 0. King, the county…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Albaugh v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. People v. LamanuzziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  4. People v. EnnisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API