Legal Opinion

People v. De Leon

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 5, 1917No. Crim. No. 695PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

The defendant, Maurice De Leon, was convicted by a jury of a misdemeanor, consisting in the alleged violation of the provisions of section 21 of the juvenile court law approved June 5, 1915, by the doing or omission of acts which tended to and did encourage, cause, and contribute to the delinquency of a minor.

The information charged and the proofs showed that the said defendant was at the time of his alleged offense the manager of a café in the city and county of San Francisco known as the Paris-Louvre, where intoxicating liquors were sold and consumed; that among the duties of said defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FisherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  2. Mill v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1907
  3. In re a Writ of Habeas Corpus for SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lindsay v. LindsayIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. DeibertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. People v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. People v. DanielCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API