Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 10, 1954No. 36,301PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

Certiorari upon relation of the employer to review a decision of the industrial commission awarding compensation to an employee. The award is based upon an alleged traumatic neurosis arising from the cumulative effect of several injuries alleged to have been sustained by the employee, Edmund O. Hartman, while working for the employer, Cold Spring Granite Company.

Prior to his employment by the granite company Hartman had enjoyed good health. He had had the usual childhood diseases from which he had recovered without any difficulty. He had also had an appendectomy which had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  3. Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Hogan v. Twin City Amusement Trust EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Sonny Boy's Fruit Co. v. ComptonSupreme Court of Florida · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fink v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Egeland v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  4. Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Lockwood v. Independent School District No. 877Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API