Legal Opinion

Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 2, 1943No. 33,359PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

The work of Alfred A. Barlau, employe, was to drill iron castings with a drill press in the employer’s machine shop in Hopkins. He took the castings from a wheelbarrow, in which they were hauled and placed on his right, and, after drilling them, put them in a tray on his left.

While engaged in doing his work at about 11:30 a. m. on March 29, 1938, he fell to the floor. A fellow workman found him unconscious, lying on his right side close to the press and about a foot from the tray on his left. His legs were “kind of folded back” and curled under him. His eyes were wide open…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Federal Radio Comm'n v. Nelson Brothers Bond & Mortgage Co. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Abilene & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. United States v. Wrightwood Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Helvering v. American Dental Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Tapp v. TappTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  4. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Garcia v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API