Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 1956No. 36,961PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Knutson, Justice.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant.
On or about August 16, 1919, Edmund C. Hartman, while employed by defendant, was seriously injured in the course of his employment. He was awarded workman’s compensation benefits by the Industrial Commission. The award was affirmed here. Hartman v. Cold Spring Granite Co. 243 Minn. 264, 67 N. W. (2d) 656. The facts relating to the accident and injury are stated sufficiently in our opinion in that case.
Plaintiff in this action was then, and still is, the wife of Hartman. Subsequent to the award of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
- Eschenbach v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Garrett v. Reno Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Peter Igneri and Theresa Igneri v. Cie. De Transports OceaniquesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Deshotel v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
- Martinco v. HastingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Village of IsleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.