Egeland v. City of Minneapolis
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Two separate writs of certiorari were issued in this case as a result of a single decision by the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (hereinafter WCCA). Since identical operative facts are involved, the cases have been consolidated for consideration.
The employee, Raymond Egeland, formerly a policeman with the Minneapolis Police Department, claims that he suffers from peptic ulcer disease and chronic anxiety and depression which were caused by job-associated stress. Workers’ Compensa tion Judge Parker found that Mr. Egeland suffered personal injury in the nature of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Lockwood v. Independent School District No. 877Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Linnell v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.