Legal Opinion

Egeland v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 3, 1984No. C8-82-1630, C9-82-1667PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

Two separate writs of certiorari were issued in this case as a result of a single decision by the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals (hereinafter WCCA). Since identical operative facts are involved, the cases have been consolidated for consideration.

The employee, Raymond Egeland, formerly a policeman with the Minneapolis Police Department, claims that he suffers from peptic ulcer disease and chronic anxiety and depression which were caused by job-associated stress. Workers’ Compensa tion Judge Parker found that Mr. Egeland suffered personal injury in the nature of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Walker v. Minnesota Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. McClish v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Lockwood v. Independent School District No. 877Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Linnell v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Garvis v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Schuette v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Joyce v. Lewis Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API