Legal Opinion

Fruehauf Corp. v. Prater

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 10, 1978No. Civ. 1313PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant employer appeals from judgment in a workmen's compensation suit. We affirm.

Claimant was injured by accident in the line and scope of his employment with defendant, while working as a furnace operator in defendant's plant at Decatur, Alabama on February 13, 1974. Plaintiff suffered second and third degree burns when a furnace charged with molten aluminum exploded. Approximately 55% of his body surface was burned.

After initial treatment in Decatur, plaintiff was transferred to the Burn Clinic at University Hospital in Birmingham. His physician then was Dr. Dimick. He was also treated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miller v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Stewart v. BusbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. BF Goodrich Company v. ButlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Ford v. MitchamCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1974
  5. Harris v. National Truck ServiceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PriceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hammons v. Roses Stores, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  3. Allen v. Diversified ProductsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Taylor v. MOBILE PULLEY & MACHINE WORKSCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  5. Ex Parte Dan River, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API