Legal Opinion

Montana Ore-Purchasing Co. v. Boston & M. C. C. & S. Min. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 28, 1898No. 374PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Montana.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree entered in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Montana on the 22d day of April, 1897, granting a preliminary injunction restraining the Montana Ore-Purchasing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Montana, and F. Augustus Heinze and Arthur P. Heinze, from mining or extracting any ores within the limits of that portion of the Pennsylvania lode claim lot No. 172, situated in Silver Bow county, in the state of Montana, described in the decree. The appellee is also a corporation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Metcalf v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hanford v. DaviesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Colorado Central Consolidated Mining Co. v. TurckSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. RosenbergerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. McManus v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  4. Montana Ore-Purchasing Co. v. Boston & M. Consol. Copper & Silver Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1899
  5. Nelson v. Southern Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1909

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API