Legal Opinion

McManus v. Burrows

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 22, 1919PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leo 8. Rassieur, Judge, (2) The circuit court had no jurisdiction to issue execution No. 52, and said execution will deprive appellant of his property without due process of law, in violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions. Grignon v. Astor, 34 U. S. 338; Grignon v. Astor, 43 IT.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leo 8. Rassieur, Judge, (2) The circuit court had no jurisdiction to issue execution No. 52, and said execution will deprive appellant of his property without due process of law, in violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions. Grignon v. Astor, 34 U. S. 338; Grignon v. Astor, 43 IT. S. 338; Scott v. Toledo, 3G Fed. 385; Tick Wo v. Iiopkins, 148 U. S. 667; Leper v. Texas, 139 U. S.' 462. (2) Though the court may possess jurisdiction of the cause of the subject-matter and of the parties, it is still limited in its modes of procedure and…

1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.

The appellant took this appeal from an order of the court below, overruling a motion to recall and quash an execution issued on the judgment in the case of Thomas Ward McManus (the appellant) against Camilla S. W. Burrows and Matthew Park, Trustee. Several executions were issued at different times on that judgment. The one involved in the present appeal is for interest claimed on an allowance of fees to the commissioners appointed to partition property among the parties to the aforesaid cause, in accordance with the judgment therein given.

The judgment found that McManus was entitled to a half…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Newburyport Water Co. v. NewburyportSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Starin v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Wager v. Providence InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. Dickey v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. Stegall v. American Pigment & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. EganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Johnson v. American Central Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Stock v. SchlomanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Kristanik v. Chevrolet Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  5. Hohlstein Ex Rel. Hohlstein v. St. Louis Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API