King v. Amy & Silversmith Mining Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM AND IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTi NA- The case is stated in the opinion..
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field
The plaintiff and the defendant are owners, as tenants in common, of certain mining property in Silver Bow County, State of Montana, known as the Non-consolidated lode mining claim. The plaintiff owns three-fourths of the claim and the defendant one-fourth. The defendant is, besides, the solé owner of the mining claim situated in the same county and State, known as the Amy lode mining claim. Both claims are located and patented under the mining laws of the United States contained in sections 2320 and 2322 of the Revised Statutes. The Amy claim was first located and has the earlier patent.
The…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
3Cited by40 opinions
- Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Del Monte Mining & Milling Co. v. Last Chance Mining & Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Shoshone Min. Co. v. RutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
- Stewart Mining Co. v. Ontario Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Fitzgerald v. ClarkMontana Supreme Court · 1895
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.