Montana Ore-Purchasing Co. v. Boston & M. Consol. Copper & Silver Min. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the District of Montana.
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The appellee was the complainant in a bill in equity brought to restrain the appellants, the" Montana Ore-Purchasing Company and Augustus Heinze and Arthur P. .Heinze, from taking ores from certain mining properties. It was alleged in the bill that the complainant was the owner of the Pennsylvania lode claim, and that the defendants claimed the right to follow certain veins which had their apices in the claims lying northward of the complainant’s claim; that the defendants claimed or owned a por*275tion of the Johnstown lode claim, and a portion of the Rarus lone claim, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Robinson v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City of Fergus Falls v. Fergus Falls Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Montana Ore-Purchasing Co. v. Boston & M. C. C. & S. Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dewey Min. Co. v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
- Joy v. City of St. LouisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1903
- Filhiol v. TorneyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1903
- Peabody Gold-Min. Co. v. Gold Hill Min. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. DavisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1904
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.