Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Watertown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 17, 1888No. 90PublishedCited by 134 opinions

ERROR to the circuit court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

This action was brought in .the court below, in the year 1883, to recover the sum of $10,207.86, the amount of a judgment rendered May 8, 1866, in the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Wisconsin, in favor of Pitkin C. Wright, against the city of Watertown, a municipal corporation of that State. The plaintiff in the present action, E. W. Metcalf, is a citizen of Ohio, and sues as. assignee of certain named persons who became, under assignments from Wright in 1873, the owners, in different proportions, of that judgment.

Although the question of the jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Cameron v. HodgesSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Railroad Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. King Bridge Co. v. Otoe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Tennessee v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API