Legal Opinion
Whitman v. Noel
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 23, 1947No. 500PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs sued defendant as maker of a promissory note dated April 8, 1934, and due-ninety days after date. The last payment on the note was made on January 29, 1936, and this action was not filed until more-than ten years after that date. On its face-*281the action would appear to be barred by out three-year statute of limitations1 except for the following provision in the'body'of the note: “With Statute of Limitations hereby waived.” Defendant filed an answer raising the single defense of the statute of limitations, and then filed a motion for suim-mary judgment on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Yeager v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- 1425 F Street Corp. v. JardinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Noel v. BaskinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1942
- Ray v. BruceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In re C. I. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- District of Columbia v. TschudinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kuder v. United National BankDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- Harco, Inc. v. Greenville Steel and Foundry CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
- McBryde v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.