Legal Opinion
Ray v. Bruce
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 1943No. 47PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
■ This appeal is hy a garnishee against whom a judgment was entered on June 17, 1942, for failure to answer interrogatories or to respond to a writ of garnishment served personally on June 6, 1942.
The judgment was authorized by and .entered pursuant to Title 16, Section 323, D.C.Code (1940 Edition) in part as follows: “If the garnishee shall have failed to answer the interrogatories served on him, or to appear and show cause why a judgment of condemnation should not be entered, judgment shall be entered against him for the whole amount of the plaintiffs claim, and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Hicks v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Wise v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whitman v. NoelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Yeager v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- 1425 F Street Corp. v. JardinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ascher v. GutierrezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
- Union Provision & Distributing Corp. v. FisherDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.