Legal Opinion
In re C. I. T.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1977No. 9585PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Chief Judge.
Appellant, the natural father of C.I.T. and C.M.T., seeks reversal of an order terminating his parental rights in a proceeding pursuant to Super.Ct.Neg.R. 18(c). He correctly contends that our decision in In re C.A.P., D.C.App., 356 A.2d 335 (1976), holds the Superior Court is without jurisdiction to terminate parental rights pursuant to Super.CtNeg.R. 18(c). Rely*172ing on Rule 4 11(a) of this court and our later addendum to the C.A.P. opinion,1 respondents contend that appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed and thus the trial court order is not subject to direct…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re C. A. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re LEMDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Jacobsen v. JacobsenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Whitman v. NoelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Valentine v. Real Estate CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Frain v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Jung v. JungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- District of Columbia v. TschudinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
- Trezevant v. TrezevantDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Moradi v. Protas, Kay, Spivok & Protas, CharteredDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.