Legal Opinion
Harco, Inc. v. Greenville Steel and Foundry Company
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 30, 1955No. 1597PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
This appeal is from an order vacating a judgment by default on a counterclaim. Appellee urges that the appeal should be dismissed on- the ground that such an order is not final and appealable.
It is clear that this court, with exceptions not here applicable, is authorized to review only final orders or judgments. Code 1951, § 11-772; Whitman v. Noel, D.C.Mun.App., 53 A.2d 280; Hankerson v. Tillman, D.C.Mun.App., 88 A.2d 191. Appellee relies on our decision in Lee v. Zentz, D.C.Mun.App., 44 A.2d 872, where we dismissed an appeal, saying: “The order vacating the judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Foster-Milburn Co. v. Knight, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Weilbacher v. J. H. Winchester & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Whitman v. NoelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. HillDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969
- Morfessis v. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960
- Meadis v. Atlantic Construction & Supply Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hantman v. ZeigerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Smith v. ReeseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.