Legal Opinion

Silver v. . Silver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 15, 1941PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BarNhill, <T.

The plaintiff in this cause entered a demurrer ore terms to the cross complaint for that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cross action. The demurrer must be overruled. The facts alleged in the cross action are sufficient to sustain at least defendant’s prayer for alimony pendente lite.

The judgment below cannot be sustained under C. S., 1667. This section “only applies to independent suits for alimony” and a decree thereunder cannot be entered in a cross action by a wife in a suit instituted by the husband. Dawson v. Dawson, 211 N. C., 453, 190 S. E., 749, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Robeson v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Bolich v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. McNeill v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Hendon v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Lefler v. C. W. Lane & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Story v. . StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Gardner v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Pharr v. . PharrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API