Legal Opinion

Robeson v. . Hodges

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1890PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant Hodges, rendered by Gilmer, J., May Term, 1889, Cumberland Superior Court, upon a referee’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

This was an action begun by certain wards of the defendant Hodges against him for an account and settlement as guardian. It was begun before the Court of Probate in 1878, and transferred to the.Superior Court for trial. The complaint alleges that the appellant W. J. Smith, who afterwards came in and was made party plaintiff, and the other appellant Mary L. Smith, who, not joining in the action, was made a defendant, were two of the wards; that as to the first named, he had been fully settled with, but as to the other appellant, that she had never been settled with.

The answer alleged…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Vick v. . PopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Boyett v. . VaughanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Capps v. . CappsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  5. Ijames v. . McClamrochSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ewbank v. Turner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hall v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Stacey Cheese Co. v. PipkinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Peebles v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Davis v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API