Legal Opinion

Hendon v. North Carolina Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 30, 1900PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Civil Action, to compel tbe defendant to issue and deliver to tlie plaintiff a certificate for two shares of stock owned by the plaintiff in defendant corporation, heard by Judge Predr ericlc Moore and a jury, at Spring Term, 1900, of Dueham Superior Court. From judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtClaek, J.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is the ■owner of two shares of stock in defendant company; that she lost the certificate therefor about 1874; that after the most diligent search she has not been able to find it, and that she has not, sold, transferred, or assigned said certificate of stock; that, the defendant has all along continued to pay her dividends thereon, — and prays judgment that, the defendant issue to her a new certificate for the same. The answer admits that the plaintiff is “the owner and holder of two shares of ■stock in defendant corporation;” that her name appears as such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pretzfelder v. Merchants Insurance Co. of NewarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Springs v. SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  3. Allen v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Hendon v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. State Ex Rel. Shennonhouse v. WithersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Britt v. Carolina Northern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Warren v. . SusmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Coble v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Silver v. . SilverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Setzer v. Setzer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API